|
The US Dept. of
Energy has mandated improvements to the minimum efficiency of
central air conditioning systems, which went into effect on Jan. 23,
2006. This should be of interest to those homebuyers purchasing
homes with older central air conditioning systems and heat pumps.
Realtors should be aware of the changes in order understand how this
may effect their client if significant deficiencies are found in the
central air conditioning systems and heat pumps. Before we address
what impact this will have on those purchasing or replacing these
systems, it might be best to review the main components of a central
air conditioning system.
More often than not, when the general public thinks of central air
conditioners, they think of the condensing unit they see on the
exterior of the home. This however, is only half the system. There
is also the air handler and evaporating unit that will be found
somewhere within the home. In most cases when a home has forced
warm air heat, these two components are part of or attached to the
furnace. In this case the blower that circulates the heat through
the house also circulates the cool air from the air conditioner; a
separate air-handler is not needed. The evaporator unit of the air
conditioner is mounted above the furnace within the duct-work. The
evaporator unit consists of a copper coil which is cooled by the
refrigerant flowing through it. Air is blown over the coil, cooled
and circulated through the home. A separate air-handler (blower)
and evaporator unit independent of a furnace is typically required
when the house does not have a forced warm air heat or there is
inadequate space above the furnace to fit the evaporator unit ( see
diagram below). This will be important to understand as this
article explains the potential affects of the new regulation.
WHAT IS THE NEW REGULATION?
As of Jan. 23, 2006 all
central air conditioners produced must be rated SEER 13 (Seasonal
Energy Efficiency Ratio). All current stock less than SEER 13
can be installed until supplies run out. Some manufactures
have stopped producing systems less than SEER 13 as early as June of
2005. The exception to this rule is for those apartments or condos
with through-wall condenser units. Apartments and condos may
continue to have SEER 10 units produced for them until 2010.
Time is being granted to resolve the difficulty that the size of the
new units will have where space may be very limited.
Another issue to consider
when replacing Air conditioning systems is that in 2010 the
regulations for refrigerant will change also. It may be of
benefit when purchasing a unit with a SEER 13 rating to find one
that already meets the 2010 refrigerant requirements.
The good news is that the
new SEER 13 is about 30% more efficient than the SEER 10 it is
replacing. Therefore, it should cost less to cool your home.
Of course, there are air conditioning systems with even higher SEER
ratings but they are optional. The not so good news is
that it is likely to cost more to install and retrofit when
replacing older units.
COST AND INSTALLATION ISSUES:
There are two major
factors that determine cost and installation issues for SEER 13 air
conditioners.
· The
size of both the condenser and the evaporator unit.
· What
has to be replaced when part of an older system fails.
Lets deal with the second
point first. It is most common that the exterior condenser
unit fails before the interior air-handler and evaporator unit.
In that case it was simple enough to just replace the condenser and
continue to use the older evaporator. You can no longer do
this as of Jan. 23, 2006 for two reasons: The regulations do
not allow it and you may shorten the life span of the new condenser
by using it in conjunction with an older evaporator. This
means if the condenser fails, there will be the added cost of
replacing the evaporator even if it is still functional.
Bottom line, it will about double the cost of replacement.
Why does size factor into the cost
of installing a new SEER 13 air conditioner?
Both the condenser and
evaporators are bigger than older units. This means
significantly more copper, steel and aluminum to manufacture them.
More material equals greater cost.
The condenser unit will
be twice the size or more than the older SEER 10’s. This means
a typical truck load of 342 SEER 10 condensers will be cut down to
less than 110 SEER 13 units. Shipping, warehousing and
handling cost will increase significantly.
The SEER 13 evaporator
units will be about 5 inches greater in height than the older SEER
10. This means that there may not be adequate space above the
furnace to install the newer units. In this case a separate
air-handler may need to be installed. Because of the size
there will be greater air resistance as the air-handler blows air
over the coil to be cooled. This could create a problem with
systems that already have a marginal air flow and therefore, a new
furnace or air-handler may be needed.
It has been rumored that
entire duct systems may need to be replaced in order to provide
adequate air flow with the SEER 13. We have not been able to
confirm this. HVAC contractors we have talked to have
indicated that this would typically not be the case. With
marginal air flow a secondary blower may be able to be installed to
boost the flow if the evaporator fits above the furnace. The
fact is, many duct systems are already technically inadequate for
their present systems. Cooler air takes greater pressure to
move than warm air and many older duct systems designed for older
furnaces do not allow for proper air flow, which cuts down on the
systems efficiency. It is likely that it was not mentioned to
homeowners when they installed their air conditioning systems to
older ducts designed for older furnaces because the loss in
efficiency is less than the cost of duct replacement.
It is also likely that it
goes unnoticed by the homeowner because although it is not
technically ideal for air flow efficiency, it is still cooling the
home to a comfortable level.
As with any thing else,
cost is going to depend on each individual household need. One
thing is sure, the initial cost of installation is going to be
greater. The hope is, at 30% greater efficiency, energy cost
to run them will make up for it.
How Might This Information Be
Reflected
In A Home Inspection Report?
The answer is, inadequate
or marginal air flow, the cost of new units and possible improper
mixing of new condenser units with old evaporator units may not show
up in reports or be discussed by home inspectors at all.
The Connecticut Home
Inspectors Standards of Practice outline only two requirements and
one exclusion for the inspection of central air conditioning
systems.
· The
inspector shall inspect the installed central and through-wall
cooling equipment
· The
inspector shall describe the energy source and the cooling method by
its distinguishing methods
· The
inspector is not required
to inspect electronic air filters or
determine cooling supply
adequacy or distribution balance
When “inspecting,” the
inspector is only required to report “significant deficiencies.”
Significant deficiencies mean unsafe or no longer functioning.
Inadequate or marginal air flow, the cost of new units and possible
improper mixing of new condenser units with old evaporator units do
not meet the criteria being unsafe or non-functional. They may
not be working to the ideal efficiency but they are still
functional, nor does this present an unsafe condition. The
third point of determining cooling supply and adequate distribution
has to do with whether the ducts are properly sized for the air
conditioning equipment.
All of this does not mean
this information will not show up in the inspection report.
The state standards clearly indicate that they are the minimal
requirements for the inspector and that the home inspector is not
limited or restricted from doing a better evaluation than the
standards require.
Whether information
provided in this newsletter will be presented to homebuyers by their
home inspector will be determined by each home inspection company’s
level of knowledge on the subject and company policy regarding
exceeding the required inspection standards. Most home
inspectors are not qualified to determine adequacy of air flow
distribution or balance based on the duct system in place (this is
why it is not required). As this information becomes more
common place, the issues more likely to be discussed by home
inspectors will be the problems of mixing new condenser units with
older evaporator units, since this was once common practice, which
will no longer be acceptable.
The information contained on this page is not exhaustive and is meant to
be only an overview. For complete documentation on this subject
please contact local or State heath officials. |